Archive

Posts Tagged ‘sac joaquin section’

Rumor Mill: Is Rocklin High School basketball coach Steve Taylor resigning?

April 8, 2010 12 comments

News Story (4/11/2010): The Sacramento BeeRocklin Coach Steps Down, cites relentless Pace
(Note: End of Sac Bee story mentions reason for Rocklin being placed on probation by CIF)

Rumor: I’ve now heard the entire coaching staff (varsity, JV and freshman) resigned, not just Taylor. Can anyone validate this? If true, what was the reason given?

News Story (4/9/2010)Auburn JournalRocklin’s Taylor resigns as basketball coach

UPDATE (4/9/2010): Word coming in now is Steve Taylor has resigned as coach for Rocklin varsity boys basketball. More to come as information rolls my way.

(4/9/2010) Recent activity on this web site suggests something might be in the works regarding Steve Taylor’s tenure as Rocklin High School’s varsity boys basketball coach.

Was it something a note someone slipped my way on a napkin? An anonymous email or post? Neither. It was something found in this site’s readership reports. Specifically site search terms and pages read.

Over the past week a couple of things have caught my eye.

First, when some arrives on this site as a result of a Yahoo, Bing or Google search, the search terms used to get here are captured and displayed to me as the site administrator. During the past week, I noted quite a few people arrived at the site using search terms containing one or more of the following words or strings:

– Steve Taylor
– Rocklin
– Resigned
– Rockin High School
– CIF sanctions
– recruiting violations

Second, the first story I ever published on this site, Rocklin and Roseville High School recruiting violations, has recently seen a resurgence in activity. The original story was posted on March 2, 2010. One would expect readership of the story to decrease over time, which it had. That was until last week when traffic began to climb again.

Now, I am not in the know as to whether Steve Taylor is going to resign, but if I were a betting man…

In the end, the truth will come out. I may be wrong in my analysis, I may be right. Either way, the data analysis certainly is interesting… even as a conversation piece.

Club soccer programs get kicked in the rear by CIF

April 5, 2010 2 comments

Rules changes and the impact on local high school soccer (Roseville Press Tribune – 4/13/2010)
CIF to vote on rule change that could affect soccer (Anderson Valley Post – 4/13/2010)
Kicked Out by the CIF? (Auburn Journal – 4/11/2010)

(April 5, 2010) California’s club soccer programs – specifically girls and boys U14, U15, U16, U17 and U18 teams – are about to get kicked to the curb by the California Interscholastic Federation (CIF). It seems CIF has had it with players doing double duty on high school and club teams during soccer season. They want to end this practice and force kids into playing for their high school teams only during soccer season.

Player double-duty is not a new problem. Club soccer and high school soccer seasons happen at the same time and CIF has historically allowed players to “double up.” Whether it’s fall for the boys or spring for the girls, there’s alway something going on as far as Club teams are concerned. Maybe not so much in the spring for girls high school, but the fall… well, we all know the mayhem.

The Bylaw change, if approved, will have an enormous effect on California’s club soccer programs. Most would argue it may not be that bad for club soccer since when given a choice between high school and club soccer, the sane player would likely choose club given these programs are for the most part better than high school. However, the reality is dilution to club program will be the likely result with some players choosing club and others high school. The end result will be damaged Club programs since they rely on player fees not taxes to survive.

A damaged club program is not good for US soccer in general or competition. Like it or not, these programs, not high school soccer, are where most US soccer stars are trained and groomed for the big stage.

So, here’s the skinny on what going to be voted on by CIF on May 7th and what you can do to protest. The below was taken directly from CIF documents:

Revision of CIF Bylaw 600 (Outside Competition-soccer)

This revision would mandate that students could not compete on an outside team in the sport of soccer while competing for their high school team, regardless of the season in which soccer is played. Currently, our students can compete on outside teams because we play during the fall (boys) and the spring (girls).

CIF State description on why Bylaw change is needed – Click here to read CIF document
CIF State Bylaw 600 revision – Click here to see actual Bylaw changes

CIFWatchdog Comment: This may cause serious damage to club soccer in the state of California since both high school and club have co-existed for quite some time. Club soccer is no small entity and, in fact, considered to be of higher quality than most high school programs. Many players feed into ODP and State programs from club programs.

This change effectively forces players to choose between club and high school programs. Not a good choice. I am not sure which program will suffer more, but either way, both programs lose.

If you believe this is change for the worse, I urge you to contact your CIF Section Commissioner (Click here for phone an email contact information) to voice your concerns. If you’d like to contact CIF State, direct your communication to its president, Marie Ishida at ishidasan@cifstate.org or 916-239-4477.

The more people knowing about this and complaining the better the chance of derailing it – Please send this link to your friends –  https://cifwatchdog.wordpress.com/2010/04/05/club-soccer-gets-kicked-in-the-rear-by-cif/